Bath · Bristol · London
Crane Index™ research · 2026

AI Crawler Blocking Statistics 2026

What websites tell AI crawlers in robots.txt, and what their firewalls actually do when an AI agent asks for a page.

In the Crane Index™ scan of 1 October 2026, 25 of 2,295 readable websites (1%) blocked an AI answer crawler in robots.txt. The edge told a different story: 191 of the 2,207 sites probed (9%) refused at least one AI agent's request while serving a browser the same page, and 606 of the 3,368 sites approached (18%) refused the scanner outright.

What was measured, and what was not

The robots.txt figures are each site's own published policy. The edge figures come from requests sent from the Crane scanner's network carrying each AI agent's published name, compared with a browser request on the same pass.

A site that checks a crawler's network address may refuse that request and still admit the real crawler, so these counts show how sites treat an unverified request in an AI agent's name. How the real crawlers are treated is unmeasured. Probes with no browser baseline (88) and robots.txt files that could not be read (16) are counted as inconclusive, not as either answer.

Key statistics, 2026

  • 2525 of 2,295 readable websites (1%) blocked an AI answer crawler in robots.txt. Link
  • 191191 of 2,207 sites probed (9%) refused at least one AI agent's request at the edge while serving a browser. Link
  • 1717 refused every one of the 5 AI agents probed. Link
  • 111GPTBot was the agent most often refused, by 111 sites (5%). Link
  • 44 answered an AI agent with HTTP 402, Payment Required, which the scanner reads as a pay-per-crawl response. Link
  • 606606 of 3,368 sites approached (18%) refused the scanner outright, 354 of them (58%) from an edge network the scanner identified as Cloudflare. Link

robots.txt: the published policy

Most AI companies run separate crawlers for training models and for answering live questions, and robots.txt can treat them differently. OpenAI, for example, documents GPTBot as its training crawler and OAI-SearchBot as the crawler that decides whether a site can appear in ChatGPT search answers, with each setting independent of the other.

2,254 of 2,295 readable websites allowed the major AI answer crawlers. These are the answer crawlers the 25 blocking sites named:

AI answer crawlers blocked in robots.txt, 2026
AI answer crawler blockedSites
PerplexityBot22
Claude-SearchBot13
OAI-SearchBot13

Among the sites that allowed the answer crawlers, these other AI crawlers were blocked, most of them crawlers that gather training data:

Other AI crawlers blocked in robots.txt, 2026
Other AI crawler blockedSites
Bytespider45
CCBot37
GPTBot30
Meta-ExternalAgent30
Applebot-Extended20
ClaudeBot19
Google-Extended17
cohere-ai16
Diffbot14
omgili13
ImagesiftBot11
OAI-AdsBot5
Perplexity-User3
ChatGPT-User1

OAI-AdsBot is neither a training nor an answer crawler: OpenAI says it reviews landing pages for ChatGPT Ads, so blocking it matters only to a site that advertises there.

At the edge: what an AI agent's request gets back

A firewall or bot-protection service answers a request before the site's robots.txt is ever consulted, so a site can publish an open policy and still turn AI agents away. Each readable site was sent a browser request and a request in the name of each of 5 AI agents on the same pass.

Sites refusing each AI agent at the edge, 2026
AI agentSites refusing itShare of 2,207
GPTBot1115%
ClaudeBot1095%
PerplexityBot683%
ChatGPT-User593%
OAI-SearchBot352%

2,016 sites gave every agent the page a browser got. 174 refused some agents, and 17 refused all of them.

The sites the scan could not read

1,073 of the 3,368 sites approached (32%) returned nothing the scanner could read. The Crane Index reports each of them as unmeasured, not failed.

Why sites could not be read, 2026
What happenedSites
Refused the scanner at the edge606
Did not respond, or the connection failed357
Responded with no readable content (often a page built entirely in the browser)108
Responded with something other than a web page2

Of the 606 refusals, this is the edge network the scanner identified in each response:

Edge network named in each refusal, 2026
Edge network named in the refusalSitesShare
Cloudflare35458%
Not identified11419%
Akamai8915%
AWS CloudFront or AWS WAF356%
DataDome71%
Imperva (Incapsula)41%
Kasada2under 1%
Fastly1under 1%

A refusal of the scanner is not proof that AI engines are refused too, for the network-address reason above. It does show how often a site's front door is set to turn away a reader it does not recognise, which is worth checking against what the business intends.

Common questions

AI crawler questions.

How many websites block AI crawlers?

In robots.txt, few. In the Crane Index scan of 1 October 2026, 25 of 2,295 readable websites blocked an AI answer crawler there. At the edge, where a firewall answers before robots.txt is read, 191 of the 2,207 sites probed refused at least one AI agent's request while serving a browser the page.

Does blocking GPTBot remove a site from ChatGPT search?

Not according to OpenAI. Its crawler documentation describes GPTBot as the crawler for training and OAI-SearchBot as the one that decides whether a site can appear in ChatGPT search answers, and says each robots.txt setting is independent of the others.

Why would a site refuse AI agents without meaning to?

Bot protection at the edge, run by a hosting or security provider, can refuse automated requests by default. That this explains most of the refusals measured here is an inference, not a measurement: the scan records what each request got back, not why.

Is a site that refuses the scanner marked down in the Crane Index?

No. A site the scan cannot read is reported as unmeasured, not as failed, because a site that verifies crawlers by their network address may admit the engines it recognises while refusing an unfamiliar reader.

The data

More from the 2026 data.

Your own site

Is your site turning AI agents away?

The free Crane Index scan runs the same robots.txt and edge checks on any website.

Cite this pageLicensed CC BY 4.0. Cite as: The Crane Index™, AI crawler access 2026, The Crane Consultancy, measured 1 October 2026. https://thecraneconsultancy.com/research/ai-crawler-access-2026/

The Crane Standard

The senior read,
once a week.

Most marketing newsletters are noise on a schedule. This is not that. Once a week I send a short, considered read on the shifts that actually change what you should do, across the AI shift, PPC, technical SEO and analytics. Filtered, weighted and signed off by me before it goes out. The judgement is mine, and now you can hear every edition in my own voice.

Nic CraneFounder, The Crane Consultancy

Topics you want

All three lands every Tuesday. Choose a selection and you get only those, as and when they publish, always on a Tuesday.

One considered email a week, edited and signed off by Nic. No filler, no sharing, unsubscribe in a click. By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Prefer LinkedIn? Subscribe on LinkedIn instead, the same edition, delivered by push and email.