Aveline Retreats
An illustrative Crane Intelligence suite for a fictional luxury-hospitality group. Every figure is invented; a real suite is built around your own business and its decisions. Browse the instruments below.
The whole picture, on one screen.
Paid media leads because that is where most engagements begin. The same screen extends to organic, AI search and the revenue in your CRM as each is wired in, every channel held to one definition of profit.
Tracked revenue, this year vs last
Budget pacing · Crane Engine™
| Platform | Investment | Clicks | CPC | Bookings | Cost / booking | ROAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | £10,400 | 6,180 | £1.68 | 288 | £36.11 | 824% |
| Meta | £4,300 | 3,020 | £1.42 | 104 | £41.35 | 701% |
| Microsoft | £1,500 | 690 | £2.17 | 38 | £39.47 | 733% |
| All paid | £16,200 | 9,890 | £1.64 | 430 | £37.67 | 792% |
The budget has a right answer.
Pacing is not an art. It is the deterministic maths of releasing a budget over time and across campaigns, recomputed every morning so the month lands on target, and every pound goes where it earns the most.
This month’s glide
Where the next pound earns most
A better split, same total.
Before we spend a pound, the Engine proposes next month’s allocation, holding the total identical and moving budget toward where the evidence says it will earn more.
Current split
Proposed split
What the Engine weighs.
Every morning, before it moves a single pound, the Engine reads all of this and rebalances, then holds the line.
How machines read you.
AI search decides who to cite by how well it can read you. The Crane Index scores that readability for your site and each competitor, on the same deterministic rubric, so you can see exactly where you stand.
The three reads · retrieval · agent execution · brand representation
The reading order · you vs your set, on the retrieval read
Who you meet in the auction.
Where you stand against the businesses bidding on the same searches, read from auction insights, so a hot auction is met with judgement rather than a reflex bidding war.
Impression share · the non-brand search auction
| Rival | Impression share | Overlap rate | Position above | Top of page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitor A | 28% | 46% | 31% | 64% |
| Competitor B | 18% | 39% | 22% | 58% |
| Competitor C | 11% | 27% | 14% | 49% |
| You | 42% | — | — | 81% |